'Existentialism is a Humanism Essay\r'

'In existential philosophy is a Hu sliceism, Sartre explains that in human universes, â€Å" cosmea precedes essence. ” Meaning, human race atomic number 18 establishd with push through all purpose, b arly with growth and maturing they find their purpose. J. P. Sartre gives the example of the write up clip, noting that this inanimate object was created with the intent of a purpose. Therefore, that estimate lead to it’s creation. He uses this example to demonstrate â€Å" essence precedes population. ” He states, â€Å" man is nothing else, but what he makes of himself. ” Simply put, us as humans are first born than we create our own paths in our lives and who we shall be in life.\r\nThis explains that through our actions and closings we make in our lives, molds us into the beings we become. Further mentioning that we are the choices we make, are we trustworthy for who are as individuals because of that. Sartre goes on to suppose there are two kinds of existentialists. wholeness of them being Christians, Catholics, or mickle who weigh in beau ideal. As well as atheistic existentialists who do not imagine in theology such as himself. However, one thing they ploughshare is both(prenominal) groups believe in the idea of â€Å" existence precedes essence.\r\n” But, those who believe in God believes God was a superior power who created people with a purpose, which ties into the idea of the paper clip. With that being said, though men has diverse traits and characteristics, they share the same basic qualities because if human nature. On the other hand, the atheistic view believes God is nonexistent and a man starts as nothing and later defines himself. Therefore, Sartre states, â€Å"There is no determinism, man is free, man is freedom…. We relieve oneself no values or commands to upset to which legitimize our conduct. ” In other words, we get to no excuses, and we are entirely accountable for ou r decisions.\r\nTherefore, there is no God to bid guidance on the proper elbow room to live and we must find that come forth through our choices. He goes on the idea of subjectivism, saying that one man’s acts creates the image of every man as a whole. Which, develops the idea of what men ought to be as individuals. Sartre also replies that, â€Å"it is impossible for man to transcend human inbornness. ” He isn’t saying â€Å"I prefer subjectivity over objectivity,” he’s asking, â€Å"how support we possibly not be subjective? ” Even the religious individual who believes that religion is absolute and comes from God must, at whatever point, choose to believe that this is the case.\r\nOur obligation is a blessing and a curse. It leads us to expression things like wound and despair. We experience anguish in the face of our subjectivity, because by choosing what we are to do, we â€Å"choose for everyone”. When you make a decis ion you are saying â€Å"this is how anyone ought to be present stipulation these circumstances. ” Many people sire’t feel anguish, but this is because they are â€Å"fleeing from it. ” If you don’t feel a brain of anxiety when you make decisions, it’s because you are forgetting about your â€Å"total and deep right” toward yourself and all of humanity.\r\nDespair arises because we only have power to change things that are in spite of appearance our power to change, and there is a readiness we cannot change. With that being said, reality is unbiased and out of our control, except for small aspects of it here and there. We despair because we can never have proficient control of the future. However, we are the rulers of our lives, we take the responsibility of our actions and ourselves in general. Regardless of what you believe, this cannot be any other way.\r\n'