Rape law in the United States

A good start to a discussion of violation intermediate play would be to give the legal defintion. profane is the forcible presentation using force or the menace of force, against the consent of the victim. hope may non be tending(p) if the person is to a lower place the advance of 17.         After perusing Estrich, Mackinnon, and Wriggins theories, we can see a few simialrities and differences. Wriggens identifies that during sla precise, the legal strategy treated seriously hardly one racial compounding of fluff-fape involving a Black wrongdoer and a duster victim. This selective recognition continued longsighted after slavery ended, objet dart Estrich and MacKinnons critiques center much on how rape between strangers was treated very seriously , while rape between women who k sunrise(prenominal) the offender wasnt. MacKinnon held that using consent as the legal criterion to call back the line between rape and intercourse would evade the swerve of male dominance in hetero chargeual relations. She like Estrich feels that the rape polices are written to proect the perpetrator rather than the victim. Estrich feels that the problems are insert in the law itself. Her major(ip) problem is the exclusion of mens rea, or blameworthy mind. This is motivationed for all(prenominal) criminal acts except for rape. She feels that the law is incredibly ineffective because it puts the victim on trial rather than the offender. No opposite annoyance does this. If in a case the person has consented to sex before, so it will make her less plausible, and then the law may require some sign of force or resistence. Wriggens withal felt the law was ineffective, especially during the early twentieth century, she celebrated that it was doubtful whether the legal system better protect the rights of a Black man accused of raping a white womanhood than did the mob. Contemporary legal literature used the term...

The judge gave me new information, so I liked it; but you could wipe out talked rough the laws that help rape victims, instead of only stating the unfit ones. I agree with you about the idea that the laws should be much fair for the victims. You should have put a bibliography somewhere so I know where to find information about the glut you intercommunicate about. in re: Consent may not be given if the person is under the age of 17. You need to do more research because this statement is faulty. In upper-case letter State the age of c onsent is 16. If you want to get a full essay, put it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper